Dividends and controlling shareholders

The substantial shareholder

The definition in section 88 of the Ordinance and its consequences

Key points

  • A substantial shareholder holds, directly or indirectly, alone or together with another, at least 10% of one of the means of control in the company.
  • Dividend tax rate: 30% for a substantial shareholder, compared with 25% for other shareholders.
  • Holdings of relatives are aggregated for the 10% test.

The term "substantial shareholder" is used in many provisions of the Income Tax Ordinance, above all in setting the tax rate on dividends. Misclassifying a shareholder may lead to withholding at the wrong rate.

The definition — section 88 of the Ordinance

A substantial shareholder is someone who holds, directly or indirectly, alone or together with another, at least ten percent of one or more of the means of control in the company — such as the right to profits, the right to appoint a director and the right to vote at the general meeting.

"Together with another" — relatives

Holding "together with another" includes holding together with a relative, and with someone who regularly cooperates with the holder under an agreement on material matters of the company. So two siblings each holding 6% are both substantial shareholders.

Main consequences

  • Dividend tax: 30% for a substantial shareholder, compared with 25% for other shareholders.
  • Section 3(t1): withdrawals by a substantial shareholder not repaid by the end of the following tax year may be treated as income.
  • The "controlling shareholders" test for the turnover ceiling in section 62A(a1) — relatives count together.

Example

A shareholder holds 8% of the company and their brother holds 4%. The company distributes a dividend of ILS 100,000 to the shareholder.

  • Holding together with a relative: 8% + 4% = 12% — a substantial shareholder.
  • Dividend tax: 100,000 × 30% = ILS 30,000 (and not ILS 25,000).

Frequently asked questions

Is indirect holding included? Yes — holding through another company is also included in the test.

Is holding 10% of the right to profits alone enough? Yes — holding 10% of one of the means of control is enough.

Sources

  • Income Tax Ordinance, sections 88, 125B and 3(t1)

Rates and amounts are correct as of the update date. This is a translation of the Hebrew article; in case of a discrepancy, the Hebrew version prevails.

For an exact computation for the client fileThe calculator fills in the figures directly from the trial balance (the system interface is in Hebrew).
Dividend tax calculator — free, no sign-up

This article is for general information only. It does not constitute tax advice or a professional opinion, and does not replace a specific review of each case.